|
課程名稱 |
佔領運動專題
Seminar on Occupy Movements |
|
開課學期 |
108-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
何明修 |
|
課號 |
Soc7085 |
|
課程識別碼 |
325 M7410 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
|
上課地點 |
社110 |
|
備註 |
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1081Soc7085_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
晚近以來，世界各地都爆發了大規模佔領運動，引發與政府當局的持久對峙與嚴重政治危機。從雅典的憲法廣場、開羅的解放廣場、馬德里的太陽門廣場、紐約的華爾街、伊斯坦堡的Taksim廣場、基輔的獨立廣場、香港的金鐘、台灣的立法院，佔領抗議者之身影，已經在國際媒體廣為傳播，並且帶來重大的社會與政治衝擊。
全球佔領運動有下列的共同特徵：共同的特徵在於缺乏大型組織之動員、高度依賴數位通訊科技、自發性的群眾參與、多元而異質的訴求、面臨經濟困頓的青年群體等。埃及革命的參與者Wael Ghonim，曾指出現代的革命不再需要領導者，只需要「依循群眾的智慧」，因此帶來「第二代革命」（Revolution 2.0）的新時代。
|
|
課程目標 |
這一門課將要回顧晚近的研究文獻，這門課程所規劃的主題，主要可以分為下列的幾個面向：
(1)佔領運動的意義：大規模的佔領運動意味民主體制的解體、人民對於政治制度的不信？亦或是公民力量的覺醒，訴求直接民主風潮之興起？
(2)佔領運動的起源：新的傳播科技扮演了何種的作用？國際擴散是否有助於相似的行動產生？青年世代的覺醒與其經濟不滿扮演了何種角色？
(3)佔領運動的過程：要如何維持長期抗爭的參與？執政者又是如何因應佔領運動所帶來的危機？
(4)佔領運動的後果：佔領風潮是否有可能轉化成為體制內的參與？從抗議到組黨參選，所可能面臨挑戰與危險何在？ |
|
課程要求 |
這一門研究所的課程，除了講員授課以外，我期待學生自發性地提出問題，無論是針對講員的授課內容疑義，或是個人心得分享。主動提問與發表看法，不僅是學生的受教權益，也會影響課堂表現的分數。
指定讀物是每次授課的主要內容，希望學生能在上課前先抽空閱讀其內容。每週的讀物都要有學生負責口頭報告，並且準備簡單的書面內容。負責同學除了整理、說明讀物的內容主旨以外，更要加以評論、發表個人感想、提供課堂討論的主題。我會期待同學能夠在課堂報告之前，能夠充份準備，自行將必要的背景知識補足。
為了鼓勵所有同學事先閱讀的習慣，並且避免淪為只有負責口頭報告同學有讀的不良風氣，上課同學最少要繳交8次的「隨堂心得」。「隨堂心得」是針對每週指定閱讀內容(不得與負責口頭報告的內容一樣)的個人提問，其內容務必精簡，篇幅不超過200字。在每週二晚上十點之前，需要將「隨堂心得」email給負責報告的同學，其內容將會成為上課討論的一部分。
期中與期末有兩次的「讀書心得」，每次不得少於4,000字。其內容需要是與課程指定閱讀內容有關，或其運用延伸。讀書心得可以用「研究紀要」(research note)的方式撰寫，建議以課程羅列的相關參考文獻找寫作的靈感或題材。
如果涉及抄襲，依校規處理。第一次讀書心得報告不得晚於第9週(11/6)，第二次不得晚於第18週(1/8)，請用email繳交。
每週進行方式如下：
(1)第一堂課：講員簡介(5分鐘)、口頭報告I(20分鐘)、課堂討論(25分鐘)。
(2)第二堂課：口頭報告II(20分鐘)、課堂討論(30分鐘)。
(3)第三堂課：「隨堂心得」之討論(50分鐘)
本課程的上課講義會在帝宇影印店製作，請同學在第一次上課時登記份數，並且自行前往購買。帝宇是在辛亥路2段155號1樓(台大校園對面)，電話2736-8495。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註： 週四下午一點至三點(請先預約) |
|
指定閱讀 |
見每週進度 |
|
參考書目 |
見每週進度 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
口頭報告 |
20% |
|
2. |
課堂討論與參與 |
20% |
|
3. |
隨堂心得 |
20% |
|
4. |
兩次讀書心得報告 |
40% |
|
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/11 |
課程導論 |
|
第2週 |
9/18 |
民主的危機或轉機
*Krastev, Ivan. 2014. Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1-62.
della Porta, Donatella. 2014. Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
|
第3週 |
9/25 |
民粹主義亦或是公民參與
*Gerbaudo, Paulo, 2017. The Mask and the Flag: Populism, Citizenism, and Global Protest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-27, 61-88.
Graeber, David. 2014. 《為什麼上街頭？新公民運動的歷史、危機和進程》(The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis and a Movement)，楊淑君等人譯(台北：商週出版社).
Mason, Paul. 2012. Why It’s Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions. London: Verso. |
|
第4週 |
10/02 |
佔領運動的意識型態根源
*Bayat, Asef. 2017. Revolution without Revolutionaries: Making Sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1-67.
Noueihed, Lin and Alex Warren. 2012. The Battle for the Arab Spring: Revolution, Counter-Revolution and the Making of a New Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rand, Dafna Hochman. 2013. Roots of the Arab Spring: Contested Authority and Political Change in the Middle East. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. |
|
第5週 |
10/09 |
數位通訊科技與運動動員(I)
*Castells, Manuel. 2012. Network of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 218-243.
*Bennett, W. Lance and Alexandra Segerbert. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-54.
Howard, Philip N. 2010. The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin. |
|
第6週 |
10/16 |
數位通訊科技與運動動員(II) [要另外找時間上課]
*Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2012. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. New York: Pluto Press, pp. 1-47.
Earl, Jennifer and Katrina Kimport. 2011 Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lee, Francis L. F. (ed.) 2017. Media Mobilization and the Umbrella Movement. London: Routledge. |
|
第7週 |
10/23 |
青年世代、經濟不滿與佔領運動(I)
*Standing, Guy. 2019. 《不穩定無產階級》，劉維人譯，台北：城邦。
Milkman, Ruth. 2017. “A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post-2008 Wave of Protest.” American Sociological Review 82(1): 1-31.
della Porta, Donatella. 2015. Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism Back Into Protest Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Current Sociology’s special issue on “A New Wave of Global Mobilization” (2013), volume 61, issue 4. |
|
第8週 |
10/30 |
青年世代、經濟不滿與佔領運動(II)
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2019. Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 71-94.
*Yuen, Samson. 2018.“Contesting Middle-class Civility: Place-based Collective identity in Hong Kong’s Occupy Mongkok.” Social Movement Studies 17(4): 393-407.
Joo, Yunjeong. 2018. “Same Despair but Different Hope: Youth Activism in East Asia and Contentious Politics.” Development and Society 47(3): 401-421.
Goldstone, Jack A. and Doug McAdam. 2001. “Contention in Demographic and Life-course Context,” in Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195-221. |
|
第9週 |
11/06 |
佔領運動的組織起源
*Flesher Fominaya, Christina. 2014. “Debunking Spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/Indignados as Autonomous Movement.” Social Movement Studies 14(2): 142-63.
*Clarke, Killian. 2014. “Unexpected Brokers of Mobilization: Contingency and Networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising.” Comparative Politics 46(4): 379-94.
Holmes, Amy Austin. 2012. “There are Weeks When Decades Happen: Structure and Strategy in the Egyptian Revolution.” Mobilization 17(4): 391-410.
Gunning, Jeroen and Ilan Zyi Baron. 2014. Why Occupy a Square: People, Protests and Movements in the Egyptian Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
|
第10週 |
11/13 |
佔領運動與國際支持、擴散
*Bob, Clifford. 2005. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-53.
*Bunce, Valerie. 2016. “The Drivers of Diffusion: Comparing 1989, the Color Revolutions, and the Arab Spring,” in Popular Contention, Regime, and Transition: Arab Revolts in Comparative Global Perspective, edited by Eitan Y. Alimi, Avraham Sela, and Mario Sznajder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 115-133.
International Journal of Cultural Studies’ special issues on “Inter-Referencing East Asian Occupy Movements” (2017), volume 20, issue 2.
Bunce, Valerie and Sharon L. Wolchik. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flesher Fominaya, Christina. 2014. Social Movements and Globalization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. |
|
第11週 |
11/20 |
佔領運動與政權的互動
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2019. Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven, pp. 95-149.
Cheng, Edmund W. and Samson Yuen. 2017. “Neither Repression nor Concession? A Regime’s Attrition against Massive Protests.” Political Studies 65(1): 1-20.
Cai, Yongshu. 2017. The Occupy Movement in Hong Kong: Sustaining Decentralized Protest. London: Routeldge. |
|
第12週 |
11/27 |
佔領運動的日常政治(I)
*Tominaga, Kyoko. 2017. “Social Reproduction and the Limitation of Protest Camps: Openness and Exclusion of Social Movements in Japan.” Social Movement Studies 16(3): 269-82.
*黃舒楣與Ian Rowen. 2015.「撐起雨傘的非常城市：遇見他者的閾限空間」，《考古人類學刊》83：25-56。
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 2015. 《嘉年華的誔生：慶典、舞會、演唱會、運動會如何翻轉世界》，胡訢諄譯。台北：左岸。 |
|
第13週 |
12/04 |
佔領運動的日常政治(II)
*Lee, Mei-chun. 2015. “Occupy on Air: Transparency and Surveillance in Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement.” Anthropology Now 7(3): 32-41.
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2019. Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven, pp. 150-175.
Gitlin, Todd. 2012. Occupy Nation: The Roots, the Spirit, and the Promise of Occupy Wall Street. New York: Harper Collins.
Inter-Asia Cultural Studies’ special issue on “Hong Kong at Crossroads” (2015), volume 16, issue 3. |
|
第14週 |
12/11 |
佔領運動的參與
*Cheng, Edmund W. and Wai-Yin Chan. 2017. “Explaining Spontaneous Occupation: Antecedents, Contingencies and Spaces in the Umbrella Movement.” Social Movement Studies 16(2): 222-239.
*Beissinger, Mark R. 2013. “The Semblance of Democratic Revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution.” American Political Science Review 107(3): 574-92.
Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2012. “Horizontal Democracy Now: From Alterglobalization to Occupation.” Interface 4(1): 207-234.
Ghonim, Wael. 2012. Revolution 2.0: The Power of the People Is Greater Than the People in Power. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. |
|
第15週 |
12/18 |
創意、自我表達與佔領運動
*Veg, Sebastian. 2016. “Creating a Textual Public Space: Slogans and Texts from Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement.” Journal of Asian Studies 75(3): 673-702.
*Gan, Wendy. 2017. “Puckish Protesting in the Umbrella Movement.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 20(2): 162-176.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London: Bloomsbury.
Jasper, James M. 2014. Protest: A Cultural Introduction to Social Movements. Oxford: Polity Press. |
|
第16週 |
12/25 |
從佔領到選舉
*Ho, Ming-sho. 2019. Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven, pp. 176-208.
Sznajder, Mario. 2016. “Chile’s Winter of Discontent: Is Protest Achieving Deeper Democratization?” in Popular Contention, Regime, and Transition: Arab Revolts in Comparative Global Perspective, edited by Eitan Y. Alimi, Avraham Sela, and Mario Sznajder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227-253.
McAdam, Doug and Karina Kloos. 2014. Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Post-war America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ho, Ming-sho and Chunhao Huang. 2017. “Movement Parties in Taiwan (1987-2016): A Political Opportunity Explanation.” Asian Survey 57(2): 343-367. |
|
第17週 |
1/01 |
元旦放假 |
|